The Gender Difference In Students-Teachers Interaction At University Level: A Quantitative Analysis


  • Dr Asma Seemi Malik Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Ms. Madiha Nadeem Lecturer in the Gender and Development Studies Department, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Ms. Madeeha Tariq MS Scholar in the Gender and Development Studies Department, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan.



Teaching, Gender, Student, Interaction, University



The teaching profession is known worldwide as a respectful profession as teachers play a key role in preparing the country’s future generations. In this context, a quantitative cross-sectional research design with a survey was carried out to find out the gender-specific differences in the perception of students. The structured student questionnaire on student-teacher interaction (QTI) by Nugent (2009) was used to gather data. To this end, 300 students were selected (150 male and 150 female students) from various disciplines from a public university in the city of Lahore through a convenient sampling technique. The results revealed the gender-specific differences in the interaction between teachers and students; it was found that male teachers are significantly higher in their attitude and attention-holding skills compared to female teachers. The outcomes of the research could be utilized to formulate some interventions to improve the quality of interaction between students and teachers to make the classroom environment mutually beneficial for both. 


Akhtar, S., Hussain, M., Afzal, M. & Gilani, S. A. (2019). The Impact of Teacher-Student Interaction on Student Motivation and Achievement. European Academic Research, vol.7:2, pp.1201-1222.

Al-Modhefer, A. K. & Roe, S. (2009). Nursing Students’ Attitudes to Biomedical Science Lectures. Nursing Standard, vol.24:14, pp.42-48.

Andersen, K. & Miller, E. D. (1997). Gender and Student Evaluations of Teaching. PS: Political Science & Politics, vol.30:2, pp.216-219.

Araujo, M. C., Carneiro, P., Cruz-Aguayo, Y. & Schady, N. (2016). Teacher Quality and Learning Outcomes in Kindergarten. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.131:3, pp.1415-1453.

Bachen, C. M., McLoughlin, M. M. & Garcia, S. S. (1999). Assessing the Role of Gender in College Students’ Evaluations of Faculty. Communication Education, vol.48:3, pp.193-210.

Basow, S. A. (1995). Student Evaluations of College Professors: When Gender Matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.87:4, p.656.

Basow, S. A. (2000). Best and Worst Professors: Gender Patterns in Students' Choices. Sex Roles, vol.43:5, pp.407-417.

Bassi, M., Díaz, M. M., Blumberg, R. L. & Reynoso, A. (2018). Failing to Notice? Uneven Teachers’ Attention to Boys and Girls in the Classroom. IZA Journal of Labor Economics, vol.7:1, pp.1-22.

Bennett, S. K. (1982). Student Perceptions of and Expectations for Male and Female Instructors: Evidence Relating to the Question of Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.74:2, p.170.

Bouras, H. & Keskes, S. (2014). Teacher-Learner Rapport Impact on EFL Learners’ Motivation. In Proceedings) A Paper Presented at the International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities. Istanbul, Turkey.

Bruns, B. & Luque, J. (2015). Great Teachers: How to Raise Student Learning in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: World Bank.© World Bank.

Centra, J. A. & Gaubatz, N. B. (1998). Is There Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Instruction? Journal of Higher Education, vol.70, pp.17-33.

Centra, J. A. & Gaubatz, N. B. (2000). Is There Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching? The Journal of Higher Education, vol.71:1, pp.17-33.

Chang, M. L. (2009). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 21:3, pp.193-218.

Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N. & Rockoff, J. E. (2011). The Long-Term Impacts of Teachers: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood (No. w17699). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Christensen, R., Niederhauser, D. & Knezek, G. (2016, March). Teacher Indicators for Technology Enhanced Teaching and Learning: Expanding Outcomes from Education Summit 2015. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1028-1035). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Chudgar, A. & Sankar, V. (2008). The relationship between teacher gender and student achievement: Evidence from five Indian states. A Journal of Comparative Education, 38(5), 627-642.

Churchill, R., Ferguson, P., Godinho, S., Johnson, N. F., Keddie, A., Letts, W. & Nicholson, P. (2012). Teaching: Making a Difference. John Wiley and Sons.

Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-Centered Teacher-Student Relationships are Effective: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, vol.77:1, pp.113-143.

Dabiri, E. O. (2006). Baresi-Pravesh-e Alasdair-e Amuzegar bar Paye-ye Jensiat-e Daneshamazon [Investigating Teacher’s Classroom Management Based on Students’ Gender]. Modern Educational Notions, vol.2, pp.43-69.

Dee, T. S. (2005). A Teacher Like Me: Does Race, Ethnicity, or Gender Matter? American Economic Review, vol.95:2, pp.158–165, Retrieved from HTTP://

Dee, T. S. (2007). Teachers and the Gender Gaps in Student Achievement. Journal of Human Resources, vol.42:3, p.528, jhr.XLII.3.528

Den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M. & Wubbels, T. (2004). Interpersonal Teacher Behavior and Student Outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, vol.15:3-4, pp.407-442.

Doray, M. B. A. (2005). Gender Differentiated Discourse: A Study of Teacher Discourse in the Adult ESL Classroom (Doctoral Dissertation, Curtin University).

Duffy, J., Warren, K. & Walsh, M. (2001). Classroom Interactions: Gender of Teacher, Gender of Student, and Classroom Subject. Sex Roles, vol.45:9-10, pp.579-593.

Eschenmann, K. K. (2014). Student Perceptions of Teaching Style in the Health Occupations Classroom. Journal of Health Occupations Education, vol.6:1, p.6.

Feldman, K. A. (1992). College Students' Views of Male and Female College Teachers: Part I Evidence from the Social Laboratory and Experiments. Research in Higher Education, vol.33:3, pp.317-375.

Francis, B., Skelton, C., Carrington, B., Hutchings, M., Read B. & Hall I. (2006). A Perfect Match? Pupils’ and teachers’ views of the impact of matching educators and learners by gender. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Warwick, 6-9 September 2006.

Gill, A., Herbert, G., Mathur, N. & Nagpal, V. (2011). Gender Differences and Factors that Improve Student Educational Satisfaction: A Study among Indian Commerce Students, vol.2:5, pp.27-37.

Hassaskhah, J. & Roshan, Z. S. (2013). Gendered Teacher-Student Interactions in English Language Classrooms: A Case of Iranian College Context. SAGE Open, vol.3:3.

Hopf, D. & Hatzichristou, C. (1999). Teacher Gender‐Related Influences in Greek Schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.69:1, pp.1-18.

Huston, T. A. (2006). Race and Gender Bias in Higher Education: Could Faculty Course Evaluations Impede Further Progress toward Parity? Seattle Journal for Social Justice, vol.4:2, pp.591-611.

Ibe, J. O., Adah, S. A. & Ihejiamaizu, C. C. (2013). Assessment of Secondary School Chemistry Teachers’ Quality through Identification and Use of Laboratory Apparatus in Cross. Journal of Education and Practice, vol.4:5.

Ifegbesan, A. (2010). Gender-Stereotypes Belief and Practices in the Classroom: The Nigerian Post-Primary School Teachers. Global Journal of Human Social Science Research, vol.10, pp.29-38.

Islahi, F. & Nasreen (2013) Who Make Effective Teachers, Men or Women? An Indian Perspective. Universal Journal of Educational Research, vol.1:4, pp.285-293.

Kane, T. J. & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering Feedback for Teaching: Combining High-Quality Observations with Student Surveys and Achievement Gains. Research Paper. MET Project. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Khalid S.I. & Rehman, K.U. (2010). Student Satisfaction in English Language Course: A Case of Pakistan. Interdisciplinary J. Contemporary Res. Bus, vol.2, pp.345-54.

Kimmel, M. S. (2000). The Gendered Society. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lacey, C. H., Saleh, A. & Gorman, R. (1998). Teaching Nine to Five: A Study of the Teaching Styles of Male and Female Professors. Paper presented at the Annual Women in Educational Leadership Conference (Lincoln, Nebraska, October 11-12).

Lavy, V. & Sand, E. (2015). On the Origins of Gender Human Capital Gaps: Short- and Long-Term Consequences of Teachers’ Stereotypical Biases. In: NBER Working Paper 20909. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.

Mainhard, T. (2015). Liking a Tough Teacher: Interpersonal Characteristics of Teaching and Students’ Achievement Goals. School Psychology International, vol.36:6, pp.559–574. doi:10.1177/0143034315608235

Marks R.B., Stanley D.S. & Arbaugh J.B. (2005). A Structural Equation Model of Predictors for Effective Online Learning. Mgmnt. Edu, vol.29, pp.531-63.

Marmon, E. L. (2008). Teaching as Hospitality. Asbury Theological Journal, vol.63:2, pp.33-39.

Martin, A. & Marsh, H. (2005). Motivating Boys and Motivating Girls: Does Teacher Gender Make a Difference? Australian Journal of Education, vol.49:3, pp.320-334.

Maulana, R., Opdenakker, M. C. & Bosker, R. (2014). Teacher-Student Interpersonal Relationships do Change and Affect Academic Motivation: A Multilevel Growth Curve Modeling. British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.84:3, pp.459-482.

Maulana, R., Opdenakker, M. C., Stroet, K. & Bosker, R. (2013). Changes in Teachers’ Involvement Versus Rejection and Links with Academic Motivation During the First Year of Secondary Education: A Multilevel Growth Curve Analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, vol.42:9, pp.1348-1371.

Miller, J. & Chamberlin, M. (2000). Women are Teachers, Men are Professors: A Study of Student Perceptions. Teaching Sociology, vol.28, pp.283-298.

Nugent, T. (2009). The Impact of Teacher-Student Interaction on Student Motivation and Achievement (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Central Florida, Orlando. Retrieved from EdD.pdf

Nuhfer, E. B. (2003). Of What Value are Student Evaluations? (Pocatello, ID, Idaho State University Center for Teaching and Learning).

Nuhfer, E. B. (2010). A Fractal Thinker Looks at Student Ratings. Retrieved from

Onyekuru, B.U (2015). Field Dependence-Field Independence Cognitive Style, Gender, Career Choice and Academic Achievement of Secondary School Students in Emohua Local Government Area of Rivers State. Journal of Education and Practice, vol.6:10, pp.1-11.

Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing Relationships between Children and Teachers. American Psychological Association.

Price, A. (2004). Encouraging Reflection and Critical Thinking in Practice. Nursing Standard, vol.18:47, pp.452-460.

Purkey, W. W., Schmidt, J. J. & Novak, J. M. (2010). From Conflict to Conciliation: How to Defuse Difficult Situations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Purkey, W.W. (1992). An Introduction to Invitational Theory. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, vol.1:1, pp.5-16.

Quari, A. & Bhat, S. (2015). A Study of Attitude of Male and Female Teachers at Secondary Level of District Budgam (Kashmir). International Journal of Educational Research Studies, vol.1:3.

Rashidi, N. & Naderi, S. (2012). The Effect of Gender on the Patterns of Classroom Interaction. Education, vol.2:3, pp.30-36.

Rashidi, N. & Rafieerad, M. (2010). Analyzing Patterns of Classroom Interaction in EFL classrooms in Iran. Journal of Asia TEFL, vol.7:3.

Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L. & Oort, F. J. (2011). The Influence of Affective Teacher-Student Relationships on Students’ School Engagement and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Approach. Review of Educational Research, vol.81:4, pp.493-529.

Sadker, M. & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at Fairness: How America’s Schools Cheat Females. New York, NY: Scribner.

Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M. & Thijs, J. T. (2011). Teacher Wellbeing: The Importance of Teacher-Student Relationships. Educational Psychology Review, vol.23:4, pp.457-477.

Starbuck, G.H. (2003). College Teaching Styles by Gender. Paper Presented at the Western Social Science Association Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, 9-12.

Sultana, A. M. & Rashid, S. N. M. B. (2013). A Study on Time Management and Punctuality Issues among Students at Secondary School, Kedah. American Journal of Economics, vol.3:5C, pp.52-56.

Thorne, B. (1979, September). Claiming Verbal Space: Women. Speech and Language for College Classrooms. In Research Conference on Educational Environments and the Undergraduate Woman, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA.

Tyler, K. & Boelter, C., (2018). Linking Black Middle School Students’ Perceptions of Teachers’ Expectations to Academic Engagement and Efficacy. Negro Educational Review, vol.59:1-2, pp.27-44.

Whitaker, T. (2014). Dealing with Difficult Teachers. Routledge.

Whitworth J, Price B, Randall C. (2002). Factors That Affect College of Business Student Opinion of Teaching and Learning. Journal of Education for Business, vol.77:5, pp.282-289.

Wiest, L. R. (2003). The Current Status of Male Teachers of Young Children. The Educational Forum, vol.68:1, pp.62-70.

Winters, M. A., Haight, R. C., Swaim, T. T. & Pickering, K. A. (2013). The Effect of Same-Gender Teacher Assignment on Student Achievement in the Elementary and Secondary Grades: Evidence from Panel Data. Economics of Education Review, vol.34, pp.69-75.

Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P. & Van Tartwijk, J. W. F. (2006). An Interpersonal Perspective on Classroom Management in Secondary Classrooms in the Netherlands. Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Xiao‐yan, MA. (2006). Teacher Talk and EFL in University Classrooms. China: Chongqing Normal University and Yangtze Normal University (unpublished dissertation).




How to Cite

Malik, A. S., Nadeem, M. ., & Tariq , M. . (2022). The Gender Difference In Students-Teachers Interaction At University Level: A Quantitative Analysis. Pakistan Journal of Gender Studies, 22(1), 29–50.