Investigating the Implementation of Single National Curriculum (SNC) In Primary Private Schools of Karachi

Authors

  • Dr. Aziz-un-nisa Assistant Professor, Department of Education, University of Karachi.
  • Hamza Farid Khan University of Karachi
  • Ms. Soha Abbas Department of Education, University of Karachi.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46568/pjass.v14i2.699

Keywords:

Implementation, Curriculum, Private School, Teachers

Abstract

The Single National Curriculum is a government of Pakistan's initiative to develop and implement a single curriculum for all students to provide an equal opportunity for all students to receive a top-notch education in terms of an educational plan, guidance mechanism and evaluation framework. Investigating and examining how the Single National Curriculum is being implemented in Karachi's primary private schools is the goal of this research. This research study is based on a quantitative method, and the research study is done through online Google Forms, through which 60 researchers were chosen to respond based on random sampling. The Single National Curriculum was developed and implemented in schools. Still, primary private schools and their instructors were not participating in these processes, according to the chi-square analysis of the data. Ninety-seven percent (97%) of the primary private schools in Karachi did not use the Single National Curriculum. Additionally, it was found that private school teachers were unaware of anyone else participating in the Single National Curriculum but themselves. It is therefore recommended that the Government devise a plan to address the needs, application and practicability of the Single National Curriculum to all the stakeholders, including the teachers.

References

References

Adeney, K. (2007). Democracy and federalism in Pakistan. Federalism in Asia, 101, 113.

Al-Kathiri, F. (2016). The voice of the teacher in syllabus design. English Language and Literature Studies, 6(1), 87-93. Retrieved on November 12,2021, from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fd07/29a182e3d8ecead166ef974c3f3313e369e3.pdf

Al-Seghayer, K. (2011). English teaching in Saudi Arabia: Status, issues, and challenges. Hala.

Ayers, J. M., & Huq, S. (2009). The value of linking mitigation and adaptation: a case study of Bangladesh. Environmental Management, 43, 753-764.

Banegas, J. R., López-García, E., Dallongeville, J., Guallar, E., Halcox, J. P., Borghi, C., ... & Rodríguez-Artalejo, F. (2011). Achievement of treatment goals for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice across Europe: the EURIKA study. European heart journal, 32(17), 2143-2152.

Cohn, M. M., & Kottkamp, R. B. (1993). Teachers: The missing voice in education. SUNY Press.

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health services research, 48(6pt2), 2134-2156.

Fowler, R. (2013). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. Routledge.

Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. Routledge.

Handler, B. (2010). Teacher as curriculum leader: A consideration of the appropriateness of that role assignment to classroom-based practitioners. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 3(3), 32-42.

Hashmi, R. S., & Majeed, G. (2014). Saraiki Ethnic Identity: Genesis of Conflict with State. Journal of political studies, 21(1).

Kelly, A. P., & Hess, F. M. (2013). Beyond retrofitting: Innovation in higher education. Hudson Institute, 41.

Kymlicka, W., & Norman, W. (2000). Citizenship in culturally diverse societies: Issues, contexts, concepts. Citizenship in diverse societies, 1, 1-43.

Lingard, B., Mills, M., & Hayes, D. (2000). Teachers, school reform and social justice: Challenging research and practice. The Australian Educational Researcher, 27, 101-115.

Majeed, M., Bhatti, K. H., Pieroni, A., Sõukand, R., Bussmann, R. W., Khan, A. M., ... & Amjad, M. S. (2021). Gathered wild food plants among diverse religious groups in Jhelum District, Punjab, Pakistan. Foods, 10(3), 594.

McNeil, J. D. (2014). Contemporary curriculum: In thought and action. John Wiley & Sons.

Palmer, S. E. (1992). Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping. Cognitive psychology, 24(3), 436-447.

Samad, S., & Mansor, N. (2013). Population ageing and social protection in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 50(2), 139-156.

Savage, G. C. (2016). Who’s steering the ship? National curriculum reform and the re-shaping of Australian federalism. Journal of Education Policy, 31(6), 833-850.

Savage, G. C., & O’Connor, K. (2015). National agendas in global times: Curriculum reforms in Australia and the USA since the 1980s. Journal of Education Policy, 30(5), 609-630.

Twomey, A., & Withers, G. (2007). Australia’s federal future. Federalist paper, 1.

Wells, M., Hestenes, D., & Swackhamer, G. (1995). A modeling method for high school physics instruction. American journal of physics, 63(7), 606-619.

Yates, L., Collins, C., & O’Connor, K. (2011). Australian curriculum making. Australia’s curriculum dilemmas: State cultures and the big issues, 3-22.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-08

How to Cite

Aziz-un-nisa, Khan, H. F., & Soha Abbas. (2023). Investigating the Implementation of Single National Curriculum (SNC) In Primary Private Schools of Karachi. Pakistan Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 14(2), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.46568/pjass.v14i2.699

Issue

Section

Articles